How to find a climate scientist with your specific expertise
In the age of Trump, the phrase “climate change” is almost too familiar.
And yet, scientists are still in the dark about the issue.
They’re finding it hard to connect the dots between climate change and the devastation it causes, even as climate models predict the warming will continue.
“There is a huge disconnect between what people are hearing and what they’re doing,” says Eric Janssens, an assistant professor of Earth system science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
“If you can’t tell the difference, you can be doing something wrong.”
That disconnect is one of the main reasons why it’s such a challenge to understand the scientific issues facing humanity in a time of extreme uncertainty.
It’s also one of what scientists are trying to solve.
A lot of people, even the scientists themselves, have trouble saying what they believe.
That’s because the science of climate change isn’t settled.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that it takes around 3.7 billion years for our planet to warm to what we see today.
That means the climate system has already warmed twice as fast as the IPCC predicted.
In the past year, however, the public’s interest in climate change has grown, particularly among the younger generation.
And climate scientists are getting a lot of questions about the topic from them.
In a new survey, Pew Research Center found that 65% of millennials, as well as 47% of the most-educated people, believe humans are causing global warming.
The percentage of people with a bachelor’s degree or higher who believe humans have a direct or indirect impact on climate change is also on the rise.
As scientists, we want to know what we can learn from people, and this has a lot to do with understanding our shared experiences.
But, if we can’t explain to our colleagues what we’re learning, we’re not going to be able to help each other in the future, says Paul Tromp, a senior scientist at the American Geophysical Union in Boulder, Colorado.
We need to find scientists who are willing to share their knowledge, Trompe says.
“The only way we can help the public understand what we do and why they should care is by giving them access to our data and our research,” Tromper says.
And, he says, “the best way to do that is by helping them understand why they’re having these problems.”
That means a lot.
If we don’t get that, our work will just be lost.
But how do we find a scientist who shares our values?
The best way, says Janssen, is to find someone who is open to questioning and listening.
That might mean that someone who thinks climate change’s a hoax and doesn’t believe that human activities are contributing to it is willing to give us data on the issue, he notes.
That would also help us get to the bottom of why climate scientists think we need to worry.
Janssensen and Trompers agree that, in order to get to a more honest discussion about climate change, we need more scientists.
The only way to get them is to understand how the world works and how we might improve it, they say.
In his book, ” The Power of Data ,” Jansen points out that data and communication is what allows us to communicate our findings.
But it can also lead to the kind of ignorance that has allowed Trump to make climate change such a hot political issue.
“When we’re trying to make the case to the public that climate change doesn’t exist, we don´t give them a sense of what’s going on,” Jansesen says.
“And when we do that, it can be a disaster.”
That’s not to say that scientists aren’t trying to find ways to communicate better.
Last year, scientists at the European Commission published a guide to how they could use social media to make their voices heard on climate issues.
And the agency is working on a series of social media campaigns, starting with an online video campaign for scientists in March that will be distributed on a weekly basis through YouTube and other sites.
But Jans is optimistic that the efforts will still be years away.
And in the meantime, there’s a lot more work to be done, especially if we don